Short answer
The best-established part of GHK-Cu’s mechanism of action is its chemistry: GHK binds copper(II) through three nitrogen atoms with a conditional dissociation constant of about 7 × 10⁻¹⁴ M at pH 7.4[Trapaidze 2012], can take copper from albumin [Lau 1981], and the complex can be reduced by glutathione [Ufnalska 2021]. Cell studies report changes in matrix proteins and signalling molecules, but no mechanism has been confirmed in people [Mateescu 2026].
Three layers of evidence
Each claim about how GHK-Cu works sits in one of three layers. They are not equally strong.
Measured chemistry
- Copper binding
- Three nitrogen ligands plus a labile oxygen; conditional Kd 7.0 × 10⁻¹⁴ M at pH 7.4 [Hureau 2011][Trapaidze 2012]
- Competition with albumin
- GHK competed with albumin for copper(II) at pH 7.5; ternary GHK–Cu–albumin complexes characterised [Lau 1981][Bossak-Ahmad 2021]
- Copper exchange
- Measurable rate of copper transfer between peptides [Beuning 2018]
- Reduction
- Glutathione reduces Cu(II)–GHK through a transient ternary intermediate [Ufnalska 2021]
- Ternary complexes
- Forms a ternary complex with cis-urocanic acid [Bossak-Ahmad 2020]
- Reactive-carbonyl chemistry
- Forms adducts with 4-hydroxynonenal and acrolein in buffer [Beretta 2007][Beretta 2008]
Cell-level observations
- Matrix synthesis
- Collagen and glycosaminoglycan synthesis in fibroblast cultures [Maquart 1988]
- Matrix enzymes
- MMP-2 and TIMPs; copper alone reproduced the MMP-2 effect [Siméon 2000]
- Signalling molecules
- IL-6 and TGF-β1 secretion by dermal fibroblasts [Gruchlik 2012][Gruchlik 2014]
- Cell adhesion and growth
- Altered adhesion and growth of a hepatoma line with peptide–metal complexes [Pickart 1980]
Interpretation, not measurement
- Gene-expression “resetting”
- Connectivity-map analyses of cell-line data in commercially affiliated narrative reviews [Pickart 2018][Pickart 2015]
The copper problem
Copper ions are biologically active on their own. In fibroblast culture, copper alone reproduced an MMP-2 increase seen with GHK-Cu, while copper-free GHK did not [Siméon 2000]. Unless a study includes copper-only and peptide-only controls, an effect cannot be attributed to the complex. At physiological pH the lysine side chain is protonated and not bound to copper, which some authors suggest leaves it free to interact with cells [Conato 2001]; that interaction has not been measured directly.
Frequently asked questions
How does GHK-Cu work?
What is measured is chemistry: GHK binds copper(II) very tightly, can take copper from albumin, exchanges it with other peptides, and the complex can be reduced by glutathione. Cell studies report changes in matrix proteins and signalling molecules, but no mechanism has been confirmed in people.
Does GHK-Cu change gene expression?
Narrative reviews by authors affiliated with a skin-care company interpret database analyses of cell-line gene expression. Those are computational associations, not measured outcomes in tissue or people.